Ending a marriage is painful enough without the legal maze on top of it. This guide explains, in plain words, how divorce works under each personal law in India, how long it really takes, how maintenance, custody and property are decided, and what to do first. When you are ready, describe your matter in the form and an enrolled advocate who handles divorce cases can call you. It is free for clients.
Need help with your divorce and family cases? Book a free call back from an enrolment-verified advocate.
People usually start reading about divorce at the worst moment. A spouse has gone back to their parents' house, a legal notice has landed, a police complaint has been threatened, or one more argument has made it clear that the marriage is not going to recover. In that state it is easy to do something that feels right and costs you later. These are the steps most experienced family lawyers would ask you to take before you file anything.
Take an hour and write a plain timeline: the date of marriage, where you lived, when the trouble started, the incidents you remember, when one of you moved out, any money that changed hands, and any complaints made to the police, a women's cell or relatives. You will forget details within months, and contested divorces turn on details. An advocate who gets a clean timeline at the first meeting gives you far better advice than one who has to pull the story out of you over three meetings.
Save messages, emails and call logs that you are actually a party to. Keep copies of bank statements, salary slips and property papers. Photograph your jewellery and the gifts listed in your wedding records, if you still have access to them. Do not hack into your spouse's phone or email, and do not secretly record private conversations of other people. Evidence collected that way can get you into trouble and may not help your case at all.
Leaving the matrimonial home is sometimes necessary, especially if you are not safe. If you are in danger, leave and call 112 or the women's helpline 181 first; the legal position can be fixed afterwards. But where there is no danger, the way you leave matters. A spouse who walks out without reason can later be accused of desertion. A parent who suddenly takes the children to another city may find the court unhappy about it when custody is decided. Ten minutes with an advocate before you pack can save years of argument.
Relatives on both sides often push for a quick "compromise" written on stamp paper. A settlement that does not clearly deal with maintenance, custody, belongings, pending cases and who withdraws what is not a settlement. It is the next dispute waiting to happen. Read anything you are asked to sign, keep a copy, and show it to your own advocate first.
If you have received a legal notice, a summons from a Family Court, or a notice from the police or a Crime Against Women cell, do not ignore it. Missing the first date of a court case can lead to the case going ahead without you. Missing a police notice can make an arrest more likely in a related criminal complaint. Note the date and take the papers to an advocate within the week.
Almost every divorce in India goes down one of two roads. The first question an advocate will ask is not "what did your spouse do" but "will your spouse agree to a divorce if the terms are fair". The honest answer to that question decides your cost, your timeline and how much of your life the case will take.
| Mutual consent divorce | Contested divorce | |
|---|---|---|
| When it fits | Both spouses want out and can agree on money, children and belongings | One spouse refuses, or the terms cannot be agreed |
| Who files | Both, together, in one joint petition | One spouse files; the other defends |
| What must be proved | That you have lived apart for the period the law requires and both consent freely | A legal ground, such as cruelty, desertion or adultery, with evidence |
| Usual time | Roughly six to eighteen months, depending on waiver and court dates | Often three to five years in the Family Court, longer with appeals |
| Court visits | Few: mainly the two motions and statements | Many: pleadings, interim applications, evidence, arguments |
| Cost | Lower, because there are fewer hearings | Higher, and hard to predict |
| Can it change? | Either spouse can withdraw consent before the decree | Many contested cases settle midway and convert to mutual consent |
A point that surprises many people: these roads cross. A large share of contested cases end as mutual consent divorces after a year or two, once both sides have seen what the fight costs. And a mutual consent petition can collapse if one spouse withdraws consent before the second motion, which sends the couple back to a contested case. Good advice keeps both options in view.
If you are not sure where you stand, the first consultation is the place to test it. Tell the advocate honestly what your spouse has said, what they want, and what you are willing to give. A competent advocate will tell you whether a negotiated exit is realistic, and will not push you into a long case you do not need.
Have a question about your own case? Talk to a lawyer who handles divorce and family cases. Asking is free.
Divorce by mutual consent is the cleanest way out of a marriage that both people know is over. Under the Hindu Marriage Act it is Section 13B. The Special Marriage Act has the same idea in Section 28, the Indian Divorce Act for Christians in Section 10A, and the Parsi Marriage and Divorce Act in Section 32B. The steps look similar in every Family Court, though the details differ by law and by court.
The decree is only as useful as the settlement behind it. Before you sign, make sure the terms answer each of these questions in writing:
One more practical point. Either spouse can withdraw consent at any time before the decree. That is the law, and it protects people from being pushed into a divorce. But it also means that money paid at the first motion, and cases withdrawn before the decree, can be left hanging if the other side backs out. A careful advocate sequences payments and withdrawals so that neither side is exposed.
Section 14 of the Hindu Marriage Act bars a divorce petition within the first year of marriage unless the court grants leave because of exceptional hardship to the petitioner or exceptional depravity on the part of the respondent. Courts have used this power where keeping the couple tied for a year would serve no purpose. In January 2026, for example, a Division Bench of the Delhi High Court waived the one-year bar for a couple who had never lived together at all and allowed them to file for mutual consent divorce. Leave is decided case by case, so it has to be applied for with real reasons, not as a formality.
Yes, but only the Supreme Court. In Shilpa Sailesh v. Varun Sreenivasan (2023), a Constitution Bench held that the Supreme Court can use its power under Article 142 of the Constitution to dissolve a marriage that has broken down irretrievably, and to dispense with the waiting period, to do complete justice. This is a discretionary power, used where the marriage is clearly dead and a fair settlement is in place. It does not give a Family Court a new ground for divorce, and it is not a shortcut you can ask for at the start of a case.
Every advocate on Mara Vakil has had their Bar Council enrolment checked before being listed.
When one spouse will not agree, the other has to prove a ground that the law recognises. Under the Hindu Marriage Act these are set out in Section 13. The Special Marriage Act (Section 27), the Indian Divorce Act (Section 10) and the Parsi Marriage and Divorce Act (Section 32) list broadly similar grounds. What follows is how the common grounds actually play out in Family Courts, and what kind of proof tends to matter. It is a guide to the shape of the law, not a substitute for advice on your facts.
Cruelty is the ground used in most contested petitions, and it is wider than people expect. It covers physical violence, but also mental cruelty: conduct that makes it unreasonable to expect the other spouse to go on living with you. Courts have treated sustained humiliation, false and reckless allegations about character, threats of suicide used to pressure a spouse, refusal of marital relations for a long period without reason, filing false criminal cases to harass, and blackmail as cruelty in different cases. In early 2026 a High Court treated a husband's threats to post objectionable photographs of his wife online as mental cruelty and granted her a divorce.
What courts do not treat as cruelty is the ordinary wear and tear of married life: arguments, differences in taste, irritation with in-laws, or occasional harsh words. The test is the overall conduct and its effect on this particular spouse, judged from the whole record. The proof that tends to carry weight is specific and dated: medical records, police complaints made at the time, messages and emails, and witnesses who saw what happened. A petition that lists twenty vague complaints usually does worse than one that sets out five incidents properly.
Desertion means one spouse has left the other without reasonable cause and without consent, intending to end the marriage, for a continuous period of at least two years immediately before the petition. Four things must line up: the separation, the intention to end cohabitation, the absence of consent from the spouse left behind, and the absence of a good reason for leaving. If your spouse left because you were violent, that is not desertion by them; it may be cruelty by you. Letters or messages asking the other person to come back, and their replies, are often the most important evidence in a desertion case.
Voluntary sexual relations by a married person with someone other than their spouse is a ground for divorce. Since the Supreme Court struck down the criminal offence of adultery in Joseph Shine v. Union of India (2018), adultery is no longer a crime, but it remains a ground for divorce. Direct proof is rare, and courts accept that it can be proved by circumstances: hotel records, travel together, messages, or a child born at a time when the husband had no access. Be careful with allegations of adultery. If you make them recklessly and cannot support them, the allegation itself can be held to be cruelty against your spouse.
If your spouse has ceased to be a Hindu by converting to another religion, the Hindu Marriage Act lets you seek a divorce on that ground. You do not need to show anything more. The converting spouse cannot use their own conversion as a ground.
A spouse who has been incurably of unsound mind, or has been suffering continuously or intermittently from a mental disorder of such a kind and degree that the other cannot reasonably be expected to live with them, can be divorced on this ground. Courts look for medical evidence, usually through expert witnesses, and are slow to grant a divorce on a diagnosis alone. A label such as "depression" or "anxiety" in a prescription is not enough; the effect on married life must be shown.
Leprosy used to be on this list. Parliament removed it from the Hindu Marriage Act, the Special Marriage Act and other personal laws through the Personal Laws (Amendment) Act, 2019, so it is no longer a ground.
Section 13(2) gives a wife some further grounds: that the husband has been guilty of rape, sodomy or bestiality; that a maintenance order was passed in her favour under the Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act or the criminal maintenance provision and the couple have not lived together for a year since; that she was married before the age of fifteen and repudiated the marriage after fifteen but before eighteen; and, for marriages before 1955, that the husband had another living wife.
Many people assume that a marriage which has clearly failed can be ended on that basis alone. Under the Hindu Marriage Act it cannot, at least not in a Family Court. Irretrievable breakdown is not a ground in Section 13. As explained above, only the Supreme Court can dissolve a marriage on this basis under Article 142, and it does so in a limited set of cases. In practice, a long separation still matters a great deal: it supports a desertion ground, it shapes how courts read the evidence of cruelty, and it is often what pushes both sides towards a mutual settlement.
Most districts have a Family Court set up under the Family Courts Act, 1984. Where there is none, the District Court hears divorce cases. The stages below are what a typical contested petition goes through. Courts vary, and so does the pace, but knowing the stages helps you understand why the case takes the time it does.
The honest reasons are heavy court lists, adjournments, difficulty in serving papers, interim applications that come up repeatedly, and witnesses who do not turn up. You cannot control most of that. What you can control is being ready: having documents organised, attending every date, answering your advocate's questions quickly, and not filing applications that only buy time. Courts notice which side is serious. The Supreme Court has observed that prolonged matrimonial litigation only keeps a marriage alive on paper. That view is common across courts, and it is one reason judges push hard for mediation.
Divorce is not the only remedy. A spouse who has been left without reasonable cause can ask the court to order the other to return, under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act. A spouse who wants to live apart without ending the marriage, perhaps for religious or family reasons, can ask for judicial separation under Section 10. Neither is common today, but both still matter: if the couple do not resume living together for a year after either decree, that itself becomes a ground for divorce under Section 13(1A).
Not sure what applies to you? Describe your situation and a verified advocate can call you back.
India has no single divorce law. Which statute governs your case depends on your religion and on how the marriage was solemnised, and getting this wrong at the start can sink a petition. Here is how the main laws divide up.
If both spouses are Hindu, Sikh, Jain or Buddhist and married under these customs, the Hindu Marriage Act applies, whether the wedding was a temple ceremony, an Arya Samaj marriage or a traditional ceremony at home. Contested divorce is under Section 13, mutual consent under Section 13B, interim maintenance under Section 24, permanent alimony under Section 25, custody under Section 26 and property presented at the marriage under Section 27. Registration of the marriage is useful proof but is not what makes the marriage valid, so an unregistered Hindu marriage can still be dissolved under this Act.
If you married under the Special Marriage Act, which is the usual route for inter-faith couples and for court marriages before a Marriage Officer, your divorce is under that Act regardless of your religions. Section 27 lists the contested grounds, which are close to those in the Hindu Marriage Act, and Section 28 deals with mutual consent: one year of living separately before filing, and the second motion after six months and within eighteen months. Section 29 bars a petition in the first year of marriage except with leave of the court for exceptional hardship.
Divorce among Muslims follows Muslim personal law, which recognises several forms:
On maintenance, the Supreme Court held in Mohd. Abdul Samad v. State of Telangana (July 2024) that a divorced Muslim woman can claim maintenance under the general criminal law provision, now Section 144 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, in addition to her rights under the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act, 1986.
Christian marriages are dissolved under the Indian Divorce Act. Section 10 sets out the contested grounds, which were modernised in 2001 and now apply equally to husbands and wives, and Section 10A allows divorce by mutual consent after the couple have lived separately for at least two years. A mutual consent petition then follows the same six-month pattern before the decree.
Parsi divorces are heard by special Parsi Matrimonial Courts with delegates. Section 32 lists the contested grounds and Section 32B, added in 1988, allows mutual consent divorce after one year of living separately.
Clients never pay Mara Vakil. Posting your matter and the call back are free.
For most families the financial questions matter more in daily life than the divorce decree itself. The law gives several routes, and they can run side by side, which is why courts insist on full disclosure of income from both spouses.
Under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, a spouse with no independent income sufficient for support can ask the court to direct the other to pay monthly maintenance and the costs of the case while it is pending. The provision is gender-neutral: a husband with no means can claim it from a wife who earns. Section 36 of the Special Marriage Act gives a similar right to the wife.
Section 25 of the Hindu Marriage Act lets the court order a lump sum or periodic payments at the time of the decree or afterwards, considering the income and property of both spouses, their conduct and the circumstances of the case. In settled cases this is usually a single full and final amount. In December 2024, in Rinku Baheti v. Sandesh Sharda, the Supreme Court listed the factors courts weigh, drawing on earlier judgments: the status of the parties, the reasonable needs of the wife and children, each side's qualifications and employment, income and assets, the standard of living during the marriage, any career sacrificed for the family, litigation costs, and the paying spouse's capacity and other obligations. The Court also said alimony is meant to ensure a dignified life, not to equalise wealth between former spouses.
Separately from the divorce case, a wife who is unable to maintain herself, children and dependent parents can claim monthly maintenance before a magistrate. This was Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure; since 1 July 2024 it is Section 144 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. It is a quick, summary remedy meant to prevent destitution. Orders under it and under the Hindu Marriage Act are adjusted against each other, so you are not paid twice for the same period.
The Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 lets a woman ask for monetary relief, along with protection and residence orders. This too can run alongside other proceedings.
Because the same family could otherwise fight over maintenance in three different courts, the Supreme Court in Rajnesh v. Neha (2020) laid down guidelines that apply across the country. Both sides must file a detailed affidavit disclosing their income, assets and liabilities. Maintenance is ordinarily payable from the date of the application. And where orders are passed in more than one proceeding, the later court must take the earlier one into account. In practice, the affidavit is where many cases are won or lost: understating income or hiding assets damages credibility with the judge for the rest of the case.
Every court that decides custody starts from the same point: the welfare of the child comes first, ahead of the rights or wishes of either parent. The Hindu Marriage Act lets the court make custody orders during and after the divorce case under Section 26. The Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, 1956 and the Guardians and Wards Act, 1890 govern guardianship more generally. The Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act provides that custody of a child under five ordinarily stays with the mother, though the court can decide otherwise if the child's welfare requires it.
What courts look at in practice: who has been caring for the child day to day, the child's schooling and stability, the home each parent can offer, the health and conduct of each parent, the child's own wishes once old enough to express them, and keeping siblings together. A higher income alone does not win custody. In one early 2026 decision, a High Court refused custody to a father who had moved in with a second partner without a divorce, holding that the child's welfare outweighed his better finances.
Custody is not all or nothing. Courts often give one parent physical custody and the other generous visitation, overnight stays, a share of school holidays and regular video calls. Some courts order shared or joint arrangements where the parents live close by and can cooperate. A clear parenting plan, agreed between the parents, is usually better for the child than anything a court imposes.
Your mobile number goes only to the advocate who accepts your request, not to everyone.
Indian law does not divide marital property fifty-fifty on divorce the way some countries do. Property belongs to whoever owns it in law, and the questions are usually narrower: who keeps the jewellery and gifts, who may live in the house while the case goes on, and what happens to joint loans and accounts.
Streedhan is the property a woman receives before, at or after her marriage as her own: jewellery, cash, gifts from her family and from the husband's family given to her. It belongs to her absolutely. The Supreme Court made this clear decades ago in Pratibha Rani v. Suraj Kumar (1985), and courts have repeated it since. If it is held by the husband or his family, they hold it in trust for her and must return it. Section 27 of the Hindu Marriage Act also lets the Family Court decide on property presented at or about the time of marriage that belongs jointly to both spouses. Keep a list of what was given, by whom, with photographs and bills if you have them.
Under Section 17 of the Domestic Violence Act, a woman has a right to reside in the shared household, whether or not she has any title to it. In Satish Chander Ahuja v. Sneha Ahuja (2020), the Supreme Court held that a shared household can include a house owned by the husband's relatives where the couple lived together, though the right is a right of residence, not ownership, and courts balance it against the rights of the owners.
A flat bought in joint names, a home loan both of you signed, joint fixed deposits and credit cards all need to be dealt with expressly in any settlement. The bank does not care about your divorce decree: if both names are on the loan, both of you remain liable until it is closed or restructured. Settle who pays, who keeps the property, and how the other is released.
Many divorces come with criminal cases attached. The most common is a complaint of cruelty by the husband or his relatives against a wife, which was Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code and since 1 July 2024 is covered by Sections 85 and 86 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. Complaints under the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 and applications under the Domestic Violence Act are also frequent.
These are serious laws that exist for good reason, and a woman facing cruelty or dowry demands should use them without hesitation. At the same time, courts have repeatedly cautioned against sweeping complaints that name every relative without specific allegations. The Supreme Court made that point in the Rinku Baheti judgment in 2024 as well. For someone accused, the usual steps are anticipatory bail where arrest is feared, and, if the complaint is plainly abusive, a petition to the High Court to quash it. For someone who has filed a complaint, the case is in the hands of the police and the prosecution, so it is important to give accurate, specific facts.
When a couple settles, the settlement usually covers the criminal cases too. Some offences can be compounded; others need the High Court to quash the proceedings on the basis of the settlement. Your divorce advocate and, where needed, a criminal advocate should plan this together so that the divorce and the withdrawal of cases happen in a safe order. Read more on our criminal lawyer and bail lawyer pages.
Deadlines matter in divorce and family cases. Book a free call back today rather than waiting.
When one or both spouses live abroad, three questions come up: where to file, whether a foreign divorce will be valid in India, and how to attend hearings from another country.
Where to file. An Indian court can hear the case if the marriage was solemnised in India under Indian law, or if one of the other jurisdiction rules applies, such as the place where the couple last lived together in India. Your advocate will check the jurisdiction section of the law that applies to your marriage.
Foreign decrees. A divorce granted by a foreign court is not automatically valid in India. In Y. Narasimha Rao v. Y. Venkata Lakshmi (1991), the Supreme Court held that a foreign matrimonial decree is generally recognised only if it was granted on a ground available under the law under which the parties married, and the other spouse either submitted to that court or was properly heard. In January 2026 the Supreme Court applied this again, holding that a US divorce granted on irretrievable breakdown was not conclusive in India for a Hindu marriage because that ground is not in the Hindu Marriage Act and the husband had not submitted to the US court. The Court then ended the marriage itself under Article 142 because the couple had been apart since 2008.
Attending from abroad. Many Family Courts now allow a spouse abroad to appear by video conference for statements in mutual consent cases, and a spouse can authorise a family member through a power of attorney for some steps. Practice varies from court to court, so confirm it before you book flights or skip them.
Children across borders. India has not signed the Hague Convention on child abduction, so disputes about a child brought to India from abroad, or taken out of India, are decided by Indian courts on the child's welfare. If you fear a child being taken abroad, speak to an advocate urgently about an order restraining travel.
Want a second opinion? Talk to another enrolment-verified advocate, free.
Under Section 19 of the Hindu Marriage Act, a petition can be filed in the court within whose local limits the marriage was solemnised, the respondent lives at the time of filing, the couple last lived together, or, where the wife is the petitioner, where she is living on the date of filing. The Special Marriage Act has a similar rule in Section 31. In practice this choice matters a lot: travelling to another city for every hearing is costly and exhausting, especially with children.
If your spouse has filed in a court that is very difficult for you to reach, you can ask the Supreme Court to transfer the case under Section 25 of the Code of Civil Procedure, or the High Court to transfer it within the state under Section 24. Courts have generally been sympathetic to wives who would otherwise have to travel long distances, though each application is decided on its facts.
For city-level details such as which Family Court hears your area, see the pages for Delhi, Mumbai, Bangalore and the other cities listed further down.
You do not need everything on day one, but the more of this you bring, the more useful your first consultation will be.
Fees are agreed directly between you and the advocate. Booking the call back costs nothing.
There is no fixed price for a divorce in India, and any website that quotes one figure for every case is guessing. Three kinds of cost are involved.
Ask for the fee in writing, stage by stage, before you engage an advocate, and ask what is not included. A clear advocate will also tell you which steps may not be needed at all. Mediation at the court-annexed mediation centre is free of charge.
Under Section 12 of the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987, every woman and every child is entitled to free legal services, whatever her income, along with others such as persons with disabilities and people below the income limit set by the state. That means a woman can ask the District Legal Services Authority at her district court for a free panel lawyer in her divorce, maintenance or domestic violence case. Check quickly with our free legal aid eligibility checker, and see our broader guide to legal fees in India.
Every case turns on its own facts. A verified advocate can tell you what applies to yours.
Bar Council of India rules do not allow advocates to advertise or to claim to be the best, so you will not find honest rankings anywhere. What you can do is judge an advocate on facts and on how the first conversation goes.
Mara Vakil is a technology platform, not a law firm. We do not give legal advice or take cases ourselves. We make it easy for you to reach an enrolled advocate who handles divorce and family matters, and we keep it free for you.
Describing your matter and booking a first consultation through Mara Vakil costs you nothing.
Before a profile goes live, our team checks the advocate's enrolment details with the State Bar Council records.
Your mobile number goes only to the advocate who accepts your request, not to a list of callers.
We do not show ratings, success rates or paid placements. Profiles show facts: enrolment, courts, practice areas and languages.
Describe your matter, free See enrolled advocates
Ready to take the next step? Book a free call back in under two minutes.
No. Consent is needed only for a mutual consent divorce. Without it, you can file a contested petition on a legal ground.
Indian law has no automatic fifty-fifty division. Courts award maintenance and alimony based on needs, income, assets and circumstances, and the wife's streedhan is hers in any case.
Custody is decided on the child's welfare. Young children often stay with the mother, but fathers do get custody where that serves the child better, and the other parent usually gets visitation.
Interim maintenance and permanent alimony under Sections 24 and 25 of the Hindu Marriage Act are available to either spouse who needs support.
For Hindus and for marriages under the Special Marriage Act, a marriage can be dissolved only by a court decree, unless a recognised custom applies, which must be proved. An agreement on paper alone does not end the marriage.
Not always. It must meet the conditions the Supreme Court has laid down, or the Indian marriage may still be treated as subsisting.
Under the Hindu Marriage Act you should wait until the time for appeal has passed without an appeal, or any appeal has been dismissed. Remarrying earlier can cause serious problems.
Prefer to speak to a lawyer first? Talk to a verified advocate who handles divorce and family cases.
Every case is different, but certain patterns come up again and again in Family Courts. These composite examples are not real clients; they show how the law described above fits together in practice.
A couple in their thirties, married five years, no children, living apart for fourteen months. Both earn. The difficulty is the jointly owned flat with a running home loan. Their advocates spend most of the effort on the settlement: one spouse keeps the flat and takes over the loan, the bank agrees to release the other from the loan, and a balancing amount is paid in two parts, at the first and second motions. Because they have already been apart for well over a year and every issue is settled, they apply to waive the six-month gap. If the court agrees, the divorce can be over within a few months of filing; if not, it follows the normal six-month route. Either way, the hard work was the settlement, not the court.
A husband whose wife has gone to her parents' city with their four-year-old, followed by a cruelty complaint naming his parents and sister. He wants a divorce and to see his son. The advice here usually runs on several tracks at once: anticipatory bail for the family members if arrest is feared, an application for visitation so the father stays in the child's life, a careful written reply that answers the allegations without counter-attacks, and an open door to mediation. Filing an angry divorce petition full of allegations on day one often makes everything harder. Many cases like this end, after a year or two, in a settlement that covers custody, visitation, maintenance for the child and withdrawal of the criminal case, followed by a mutual consent divorce.
A wife with a young daughter, married eight years, husband working overseas and no longer sending money or replying properly. Her first need is money to live on, not a divorce decree. Her advocate files for maintenance for her and the child under Section 144 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita in her own city, with a disclosure affidavit, and considers a Domestic Violence Act application for monetary and residence relief. If she later decides to seek a divorce, she can file where she lives, as a wife is allowed to under Section 19 of the Hindu Marriage Act. Service on a husband abroad takes time, and the court may allow it by email or through his family. Because she is a woman, she can also ask the District Legal Services Authority for a free lawyer.
Have your documents ready? Book a free call back and share the details with the advocate.
Under the Hindu Marriage Act you must have lived apart for at least a year before filing. After the first motion, the second motion is normally heard after six months and within eighteen months. The court can waive the six months where the conditions set by the Supreme Court in Amardeep Singh v. Harveen Kaur are met. In practice most mutual consent divorces finish in six to eighteen months, depending on the court's dates and whether a waiver is granted.
Yes. You can file a contested divorce on a ground recognised by the law that applies to your marriage, such as cruelty, desertion for two years or adultery under the Hindu Marriage Act. You will need to prove the ground with evidence. Contested cases take longer, and many settle along the way.
There is no fixed period. In many Family Courts a contested divorce takes three to five years, and longer if there are appeals. The pace depends on the court's workload, how quickly papers are served, how many interim applications are filed and how well both sides prepare their evidence.
Under Section 14 of the Hindu Marriage Act, not without the court's permission. The court can allow an earlier petition for exceptional hardship to the petitioner or exceptional depravity by the respondent. Courts have granted such leave where, for example, the couple never lived together at all. The Special Marriage Act has a similar rule in Section 29.
Not in a Family Court under the Hindu Marriage Act. Only the Supreme Court can dissolve a marriage on the basis of irretrievable breakdown, using its power under Article 142 of the Constitution, as the Constitution Bench confirmed in Shilpa Sailesh v. Varun Sreenivasan (2023). A long separation still helps in practice, for instance in a desertion case or in settlement talks.
The court decides on the welfare of the child, not on the rights of either parent. Children under five ordinarily stay with the mother under the Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, unless their welfare requires otherwise. The other parent usually gets visitation, holiday time and calls. Parents can agree a parenting plan, and courts generally respect sensible agreements.
Not automatically. Maintenance depends on need, income, assets and the circumstances of both spouses. A wife who cannot maintain herself can claim it under several laws. A wife with a good independent income may get less or none, although maintenance for the children is decided separately. Under Sections 24 and 25 of the Hindu Marriage Act a husband without means can also claim support.
There is no formula. Courts look at the status of the parties, the reasonable needs of the wife and children, each side's income, assets, qualifications and employment, the standard of living during the marriage, any career given up for the family, litigation costs and the paying spouse's capacity and other duties. The Supreme Court restated these factors in December 2024 in Rinku Baheti v. Sandesh Sharda.
For a mutual consent divorce, both spouses usually have to appear for the motions and to confirm consent. Many courts now allow a spouse abroad, or one who genuinely cannot travel, to appear by video conference. In contested cases your advocate attends most dates, but you will need to appear for mediation, your evidence and cross-examination.
Yes, if an Indian court has jurisdiction, for example because the marriage was solemnised in India or the couple last lived together here. Foreign divorce decrees are recognised in India only if they meet the conditions laid down in Y. Narasimha Rao v. Y. Venkata Lakshmi, so many NRIs prefer to get the divorce in India or to have a foreign decree checked before relying on it.
Under Section 15 of the Hindu Marriage Act, remarriage is lawful once the time for appeal has passed without an appeal, or an appeal has been dismissed. In a mutual consent divorce neither side normally appeals, but it is still sensible to wait for the appeal period and to keep a certified copy of the decree.
Streedhan belongs to the woman absolutely. If the husband or his family hold it, they must return it. It can be recovered in the divorce case, under Section 27 of the Hindu Marriage Act for jointly owned items, under the Domestic Violence Act, or through a criminal complaint where it is wrongly withheld. Keep a list and any photographs or bills.
Yes. Under the Dissolution of Muslim Marriages Act, 1939, a Muslim wife can seek a divorce from the court on grounds such as the husband's disappearance for four years, failure to maintain her for two years, failure to perform marital obligations for three years, or cruelty. Divorce can also happen by khula or by mutual agreement (mubarat). Instant triple talaq is void and is an offence under the 2019 Act.
Advocates set their own fees, which vary by city, court, experience and how contested the matter is. A mutual consent divorce with an agreed settlement costs far less than a contested case. Ask for a stage-wise fee in writing before engaging anyone. Women and children are entitled to free legal aid under the Legal Services Authorities Act, whatever their income.
No. Describing your matter and booking a first consultation through Mara Vakil is free. Any fee for legal work is agreed directly between you and the advocate. Mara Vakil is a technology platform, not a law firm, and does not give legal advice.
Your request is shown to enrolled advocates who handle divorce and family matters without your mobile number. Only the advocate who accepts your request receives your number. Read our privacy policy for details.
Local courts, forums and practice differ from city to city. Read the page for your city:
Related services:
Free tools:
Guide: How to file divorce in India: step-by-step guide
Other practice areas:
Describe your matter in a few lines. Enrolled advocates who handle divorce and family cases in your city can see it, and the one who accepts will call you. It is free for clients.
Describe your matter, freeThis page gives general information about Indian law as of 15 October 2026. It is not legal advice and is not an advertisement or solicitation by any advocate, as restricted by Rule 36 of the Bar Council of India Rules. Laws and court practice change, and the right answer depends on your facts; confirm the position for your case with an advocate before acting. Mara Vakil is a technology platform, not a law firm. Read our disclaimer.
Join Mara Vakil as an advocate and receive divorce requests from clients near you. Free, enrolment-checked profile. Client requests in your practice area, no commission on your fees, a free case diary and your court group. Apply in about 10 minutes.