Mara Vakil
Mara Vakil
Loading, please wait
Mara Vakil · loading
Supreme Court

Accused can inspect documents the prosecution is not relying on, says Supreme Court in CBI case

September 2026 · Criminal Law · By Mara Vakil Legal Team

What happened

In Central Bureau of Investigation v. Anil Dixit, a bench of Justice J.B. Pardiwala and Justice K. Vinod Chandran held that an accused may access 'unrelied' documents (material collected during investigation but not relied on by the prosecution) where needed to prepare a defence. The timing and manner depend on the nature of the documents. The CBI was told to allow inspection of the voluminous material so the accused could identify what they need produced at the right stage of trial.

What this means for you

A fair trial includes a fair chance to see the evidence. If you are facing trial, your advocate can ask the court for inspection of material seized during the investigation that may help your defence.

Disclosure of evidence to the accused

After investigation, the police or an agency like the CBI files a police report (chargesheet) under Section 193 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS) [old Section 173 CrPC], along with the documents and statements it relies on. Section 230 BNSS [old Section 207 CrPC] requires the Magistrate to supply copies of these to the accused. Material collected but not relied on is often called 'unrelied' material. The Supreme Court has repeatedly linked fair disclosure to the right to a fair trial under Article 21 of the Constitution.

In practice, the defence first receives the relied documents. If the accused believes other seized material may help, the advocate can ask the court to direct inspection or production, for example through an application under Section 94 BNSS [old Section 91 CrPC] at the appropriate stage. Courts weigh relevance, volume, privacy and the stage of the trial when deciding how and when access should be given.

Who this affects

If you are in a similar situation

Common questions

What are unrelied documents?

They are documents, statements or objects that the investigating agency collected during investigation but chose not to rely on in its chargesheet. Such material may still contain information useful to the accused. The Supreme Court has now said an accused may access such material where it is needed to prepare a defence, depending on its nature.

When can the accused ask for these documents?

There is no single fixed moment. The Court said the timing and manner depend on the nature of the documents. Commonly, inspection may be sought after the chargesheet is supplied and production may be sought at the defence stage. Your advocate can advise on the right point in your own trial.

Does this mean the accused gets every file the agency has?

Not automatically. The court still decides what access is appropriate, considering relevance, volume, the privacy of others and the stage of trial. The ruling recognises a right to fair access to material needed for the defence, which is applied case by case by the trial court.

Need advice on a similar problem?

Talk to a verified advocate who handles these cases.

Find an advocate Criminal Lawyers Help Center

Sources

This is a news summary for general information, not legal advice. Read the full judgment or consult an advocate before relying on it.

Related news

← All legal news

For advocates

Are you an advocate? Join Mara Vakil

Free, enrolment-checked profile. Client requests in your practice area, no commission on your fees, a free case diary and your court group. Apply in about 10 minutes.

Join as an advocateHow joining works